Trying out this Substack thread feature to ask all you smart folks out there if you have some reasonable reasons why we haven’t (at least, not publicly and officially) been back to the moon in 50 years. Give me all your theories, I’m willing to entertain all ideas, lay it on me.
Is the moon simply a projection? Is it inhabited by aliens? Is DARPA up there building space weapons already? Lizard people living on the dark side of the moon? Links to your own blogs with more in depth narrative is perfectly fine. I want my 🤯 .
And if you have tabs on Elon Musk, can you please ask the man why we would go all the way to Mars to colonize it with Musk Hotels, wouldn’t the gorgeous view of the Earth be a better sell?
the biggest tell with the nasa moon story is that they destroyed the entire mission control system.
name another scientific advance where the initial infrastructure was completely scrapped. did teller and the manhattan project decide that this atom bomb stuff isn't worth pursuing? did fulton just decide to retire his ferry after he got sick of running it back and forth across the river? did steve jobs decide to scrap the operating system he and his open-source army had been painstakingly fine-tuning since the 1970s?
It all started with this chap called Gary, whose left big toe was incredibly inflamed due to poor personal hygeine and a previous wound. Gary's troubled youth led him to believe he was in fact a ninja, but of course he was just imagining it. When he hurt his big toe, attempting to drop-kick and break a plank to show off to his friends, he accidentally astrally projected himself into the moon, and has ever since been "the man in the moon." Because his astral face became so large, this troubled our Gary no end you see, and so his toe fell off and now it looks as though the moon is kind of grimacing. Which it is. Because of Gary's phantom toe pain. Poor Gary. When people tried to land on his face, Gary became agitated and swiped at them. The only problem was that Gary could only astrally project his FACE onto the moon, and not his arms or hands, so this was largely ineffectual, unfortunately for Gary. Fortunately for Gary, however, was that the astronauts could still sense that they were irksome and unwelcome, and so they scarpered PDQ and left instructions not to go back because of the wrath of Gary. Luckily, due to a massive black-budget psychic mission run by the Americans, NASA listened, and here we have the one true answer to that profound conundrum. The answer = Gary's phantom toe. You're so welcome, honestly. I do what I can in the aid of science.
Oracle Girl recently said the moon is really in the Earth. Ewaranon says it's a projection and that you can see the map of part of the Earth's continents on it. My gut feeling is that man has not been there, at least not in the way we have been led to believe. Beyond that, I know nothing!
We have been back, just not crewed missions. In the last 20 years there's been almost two dozen unmanned missions to either land on the moon or orbit it from China, NASA, the European Space Agency, India, Japan and Israel.
Two years ago a Chinese lander collected 4 pounds of moon rocks/dirt and shot them back to Earth and they've been studying them. They're the first lunar samples to return to Earth since the last Apollo mission.
I think your picture says it all. Which place looks like the one where you want to live? Besides NASA being an endless endeavor to disprove the existence of God through the con of evolution (to justify immorality) while giving the masses something to be ‘proud of’, spending money for the sake of spending money seems to be the government’s motivation. Elon Musk on the other hand I haven’t figured out his motivation other than reenforce his visionary persona and perhaps make money while doing it. I get the whole ‘science driver’ and technology spinoff argument, but the US is already bankrupt.
my guess is that there is more money to be made in wars and selling arms. Big business and booming right now. the moon is hard to monetize, wars are easy to start and monetize. Sickness is also easy to monetize, and you can even make sick stuff up to monetize.
Oct 21, 2022·edited Oct 21, 2022Liked by Visceral Adventure
The "we" people have not gone back to the Moon in more than 50 years for the simple reason that they —the "we" people— never went there in the first place. But the "we" people, in their relentless naïveté, believe they're going “back” with Artemis soon. And in a few years' time, the "we" guys and gals will travel to Mars with Musk, the fake musketeer. Still, in the same metal tubes and propulsion systems of the 20th-century that dropped bombs in London and blow up in the sky every so often, à la Challenger and Columbia. Good to put things in low-Earth orbit, no doubt. But going to the Moon and Mars in these extremely-limited flying bombs is pure and undiluted Star Trek stuff.
So I ask: when will the "we" people go to the Moon? The answer is never. Q: Who will and when, then? A: Those wise men and women who learn to harness the power of gravity —by inversion— and the untapped potential of the Sun’s radiating energies, and apply these to traveling machines. This is the concept of "zero-gravity." At that technological point, humans will no longer need to overpopulate central cities; concrete and asphalt roads and bridges will be needed no more, nor will ocean ships, jet planes, helicopters, trucks, buses or cars. Millions of small towns will pop up all over the surface of the Earth, without any restrictions. Wherever you want to be, that's where you will be. Including Moon and Mars. And we (not just "the "we") will all be happier than pigs in shit!
PS: no fucking vaccines, none, will be allowed in the zero-gravity, new world.
Oct 13, 2022·edited Oct 13, 2022Liked by Visceral Adventure
This is a simple question to answer. Apart from the ocean of lies out there, we've never been to the moon. That info and ample video is out there just as much as it's out there that Bldg. 7 fell DUE TO A DECISION MADE by its owner and others, TO TAKE IT DOWN. But people can't see that, so few if any of those people will see this.
Then there's THIS pantload for anyone that actually believes it;
Keep in mind that we can send one to Mars, but not the Moon because the technology doesn't exist anymore, particularly since we've regressed technologically from a computer programming perspective over the last half century. (extreme sarcasm)
Keep in mind we've also supposedly sent an enormous telescope, if it's all to be believed, beyond our solar system (several billion miles), but we don't have the technology to do the same a couple hundred thousand miles. It's "science" made for morons just like most government "science."
Lastly, and most tellingly and relevantly, we could quite easily and inexpensively send up an unmanned rover to the moon, but the problem there is the lack of atmosphere. In such an environment, on top of the lander, flags, and all the other trash left up there, it and the landscape behind it, would have to be in the EXACT SAME PLACES! THAT'S why it'll never happen.
In fact, if they wanted to, they could go LOOONG way to dispelling this "conspiracy theory," to be contrasted with the actual Moon Landing Conspiracy, and would in a matter of moments do so. Alas, the Arizona or Nevada (or whichever) desert they filmed it in, is clearly not in a no atmosphere environment, so ... well, that ship has sailed permanently. Anything else would have to be CGI and graphical subterfuge.
The government has already admitted that what was on the TV back then as "moon landing coverage" was all faked, staged, and contrived. Why? Because they wanted to show us something to "prove" it. So apparently making a movie short(s) and lying about it was the answer.
Keep in mind that they only came clean on that well AFTER it became known otherwise and from sources outside the government, which makes its own statement.
Well, when you really delve into all the theories about what really happened why we never went there again.. the truth is rather eye opening. So take this with a grain of salt but it's been my passion to find out the truth about what's really going on in space. What I'm about to say will sound crazy to many people because the reality of it is so far beyond what we are used to.. but it's the truth for me.
If you watch the discovery channel documentaries about all the abnormalities of the moon landing etc. you are conditioned into believing that we never went there and that it was just all a "fake" moon landing.
When you delve further into the topic from all types of different information sources, it turns out that we actually did go to the moon... much earlier than were told to have gone there. The Nazis were the first, followed by a joint mission of American and Soviet people who were welcomed by the Nazis who had already established a base there. They knew what was up there.. many bases belonging to many different alien civilizations, crashed spaceships, destroyed domes.. it was impossible for them to show what's really at the surface of the moon without also telling people that they are not alone and very much connected to many alien civilizations. So they faked the whole 1969 moon landing. Most of the footage was recorded in a studio. Hence the weird anomalies of the footage.
Ever since, they opened up 2 new bases on the Moon (already fully operational by the 70s) and the Nazi's transfered ownership of their own base to the secret space programs of the west. They've been regularly going to the Moon since the 50's. They never stopped. They just don't tell people that they're going because if they did, it invites millions of other questions about what's going on over there. They would have to fake a lot of new footage. It's extremely easy to get there with their fancy old alien reproduction vehicles which create a field around the craft that shields it from normal momentum effects and altering gravity.
I forget how but someone flipped this on its head and makes the point that is weird we went at all given the expense. If the USSR didn't care about space we would never have bothered going beyond low orbit. Maybe we're waiting for another communist rival to get our juices going.
I'm not sure what to make of it all. It does seem odd to me we haven't gone back and definitely feeds into the conspiracies if we ever went at all.. Which are awesome and I'll never not enjoy speculating about them.
I missed your final comment - I agree completely, going to Mars is orders of magnitude more costly and risky than the Moon. We would be far better off trying a Moon colony first, which we could reach in a few days in case of need or emergency.
I'm sorry, but I have to jump in here. I've read almost all the comments and I'm amazed, but in a sad way. We haven't been 'back' because we never went to begin with. THE EARTH IS FLAT!!! You linked the Ewaranon documentary and that is where you should all start. Forget the fact that 'space' (as we are brainwashed) is physically and scientifically impossible, just look at the world of construction. It's simple geometry. How do you find LEVEL on a ball??(NO ONE has ever been taught this in school) I'll help you.... YOU CAN'T.
All measurements must have a reference point. On a 'globe', that point MUST be the center of the sphere. Which means what? It means that you will NEVER be able to have vertical parallel lines to construct a wall, let alone a building over 2000 feet tall (in Dubai). In the same vain, you can't have perpendicular on that sphere BECAUSE THERE IS NO LEVEL POINT ANYWHERE.
Every blueprint that has ever been created has ONE thing in common, a flat level surface. Now that's not to say there aren't elevation changes, like mountains and valleys. But there has never been an accounting for curvature on said blueprints. And I guarantee if you ask every surveyor what their formula was to account for said curvature, they'll look at you like you have three heads.
Besides, water is the only proof you need. It's called sea LEVEL for a reason. The word horizontal comes from HORIZON, not CURVIZON😳😂 and water cannot flow UP the ball, like the Nile or even the Amazon. It always seeks the lowest point.
the biggest tell with the nasa moon story is that they destroyed the entire mission control system.
name another scientific advance where the initial infrastructure was completely scrapped. did teller and the manhattan project decide that this atom bomb stuff isn't worth pursuing? did fulton just decide to retire his ferry after he got sick of running it back and forth across the river? did steve jobs decide to scrap the operating system he and his open-source army had been painstakingly fine-tuning since the 1970s?
It all started with this chap called Gary, whose left big toe was incredibly inflamed due to poor personal hygeine and a previous wound. Gary's troubled youth led him to believe he was in fact a ninja, but of course he was just imagining it. When he hurt his big toe, attempting to drop-kick and break a plank to show off to his friends, he accidentally astrally projected himself into the moon, and has ever since been "the man in the moon." Because his astral face became so large, this troubled our Gary no end you see, and so his toe fell off and now it looks as though the moon is kind of grimacing. Which it is. Because of Gary's phantom toe pain. Poor Gary. When people tried to land on his face, Gary became agitated and swiped at them. The only problem was that Gary could only astrally project his FACE onto the moon, and not his arms or hands, so this was largely ineffectual, unfortunately for Gary. Fortunately for Gary, however, was that the astronauts could still sense that they were irksome and unwelcome, and so they scarpered PDQ and left instructions not to go back because of the wrath of Gary. Luckily, due to a massive black-budget psychic mission run by the Americans, NASA listened, and here we have the one true answer to that profound conundrum. The answer = Gary's phantom toe. You're so welcome, honestly. I do what I can in the aid of science.
Oracle Girl recently said the moon is really in the Earth. Ewaranon says it's a projection and that you can see the map of part of the Earth's continents on it. My gut feeling is that man has not been there, at least not in the way we have been led to believe. Beyond that, I know nothing!
We have been back, just not crewed missions. In the last 20 years there's been almost two dozen unmanned missions to either land on the moon or orbit it from China, NASA, the European Space Agency, India, Japan and Israel.
Two years ago a Chinese lander collected 4 pounds of moon rocks/dirt and shot them back to Earth and they've been studying them. They're the first lunar samples to return to Earth since the last Apollo mission.
I think your picture says it all. Which place looks like the one where you want to live? Besides NASA being an endless endeavor to disprove the existence of God through the con of evolution (to justify immorality) while giving the masses something to be ‘proud of’, spending money for the sake of spending money seems to be the government’s motivation. Elon Musk on the other hand I haven’t figured out his motivation other than reenforce his visionary persona and perhaps make money while doing it. I get the whole ‘science driver’ and technology spinoff argument, but the US is already bankrupt.
We learned how hard it was to do anything in outer space.
When we think we can gain net value from the (solar, primarily) energy in outer space, we will engage in far more space exploration.
my guess is that there is more money to be made in wars and selling arms. Big business and booming right now. the moon is hard to monetize, wars are easy to start and monetize. Sickness is also easy to monetize, and you can even make sick stuff up to monetize.
https://centerforaninformedamerica.com/moondoggie/
He revolutionized my understanding of the presumed moon landing
The "we" people have not gone back to the Moon in more than 50 years for the simple reason that they —the "we" people— never went there in the first place. But the "we" people, in their relentless naïveté, believe they're going “back” with Artemis soon. And in a few years' time, the "we" guys and gals will travel to Mars with Musk, the fake musketeer. Still, in the same metal tubes and propulsion systems of the 20th-century that dropped bombs in London and blow up in the sky every so often, à la Challenger and Columbia. Good to put things in low-Earth orbit, no doubt. But going to the Moon and Mars in these extremely-limited flying bombs is pure and undiluted Star Trek stuff.
So I ask: when will the "we" people go to the Moon? The answer is never. Q: Who will and when, then? A: Those wise men and women who learn to harness the power of gravity —by inversion— and the untapped potential of the Sun’s radiating energies, and apply these to traveling machines. This is the concept of "zero-gravity." At that technological point, humans will no longer need to overpopulate central cities; concrete and asphalt roads and bridges will be needed no more, nor will ocean ships, jet planes, helicopters, trucks, buses or cars. Millions of small towns will pop up all over the surface of the Earth, without any restrictions. Wherever you want to be, that's where you will be. Including Moon and Mars. And we (not just "the "we") will all be happier than pigs in shit!
PS: no fucking vaccines, none, will be allowed in the zero-gravity, new world.
This is a simple question to answer. Apart from the ocean of lies out there, we've never been to the moon. That info and ample video is out there just as much as it's out there that Bldg. 7 fell DUE TO A DECISION MADE by its owner and others, TO TAKE IT DOWN. But people can't see that, so few if any of those people will see this.
Then there's THIS pantload for anyone that actually believes it;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Jn2fMYyxEc
Keep in mind that we can send one to Mars, but not the Moon because the technology doesn't exist anymore, particularly since we've regressed technologically from a computer programming perspective over the last half century. (extreme sarcasm)
Keep in mind we've also supposedly sent an enormous telescope, if it's all to be believed, beyond our solar system (several billion miles), but we don't have the technology to do the same a couple hundred thousand miles. It's "science" made for morons just like most government "science."
Lastly, and most tellingly and relevantly, we could quite easily and inexpensively send up an unmanned rover to the moon, but the problem there is the lack of atmosphere. In such an environment, on top of the lander, flags, and all the other trash left up there, it and the landscape behind it, would have to be in the EXACT SAME PLACES! THAT'S why it'll never happen.
In fact, if they wanted to, they could go LOOONG way to dispelling this "conspiracy theory," to be contrasted with the actual Moon Landing Conspiracy, and would in a matter of moments do so. Alas, the Arizona or Nevada (or whichever) desert they filmed it in, is clearly not in a no atmosphere environment, so ... well, that ship has sailed permanently. Anything else would have to be CGI and graphical subterfuge.
The government has already admitted that what was on the TV back then as "moon landing coverage" was all faked, staged, and contrived. Why? Because they wanted to show us something to "prove" it. So apparently making a movie short(s) and lying about it was the answer.
Keep in mind that they only came clean on that well AFTER it became known otherwise and from sources outside the government, which makes its own statement.
Well, when you really delve into all the theories about what really happened why we never went there again.. the truth is rather eye opening. So take this with a grain of salt but it's been my passion to find out the truth about what's really going on in space. What I'm about to say will sound crazy to many people because the reality of it is so far beyond what we are used to.. but it's the truth for me.
If you watch the discovery channel documentaries about all the abnormalities of the moon landing etc. you are conditioned into believing that we never went there and that it was just all a "fake" moon landing.
When you delve further into the topic from all types of different information sources, it turns out that we actually did go to the moon... much earlier than were told to have gone there. The Nazis were the first, followed by a joint mission of American and Soviet people who were welcomed by the Nazis who had already established a base there. They knew what was up there.. many bases belonging to many different alien civilizations, crashed spaceships, destroyed domes.. it was impossible for them to show what's really at the surface of the moon without also telling people that they are not alone and very much connected to many alien civilizations. So they faked the whole 1969 moon landing. Most of the footage was recorded in a studio. Hence the weird anomalies of the footage.
Ever since, they opened up 2 new bases on the Moon (already fully operational by the 70s) and the Nazi's transfered ownership of their own base to the secret space programs of the west. They've been regularly going to the Moon since the 50's. They never stopped. They just don't tell people that they're going because if they did, it invites millions of other questions about what's going on over there. They would have to fake a lot of new footage. It's extremely easy to get there with their fancy old alien reproduction vehicles which create a field around the craft that shields it from normal momentum effects and altering gravity.
I forget how but someone flipped this on its head and makes the point that is weird we went at all given the expense. If the USSR didn't care about space we would never have bothered going beyond low orbit. Maybe we're waiting for another communist rival to get our juices going.
I'm not sure what to make of it all. It does seem odd to me we haven't gone back and definitely feeds into the conspiracies if we ever went at all.. Which are awesome and I'll never not enjoy speculating about them.
I missed your final comment - I agree completely, going to Mars is orders of magnitude more costly and risky than the Moon. We would be far better off trying a Moon colony first, which we could reach in a few days in case of need or emergency.
The simplest, most basic reason of all: there's no profit.
Bro we are synching up big time again. Just about finished 2000 words on moon conspiracies 👀
I'm sorry, but I have to jump in here. I've read almost all the comments and I'm amazed, but in a sad way. We haven't been 'back' because we never went to begin with. THE EARTH IS FLAT!!! You linked the Ewaranon documentary and that is where you should all start. Forget the fact that 'space' (as we are brainwashed) is physically and scientifically impossible, just look at the world of construction. It's simple geometry. How do you find LEVEL on a ball??(NO ONE has ever been taught this in school) I'll help you.... YOU CAN'T.
All measurements must have a reference point. On a 'globe', that point MUST be the center of the sphere. Which means what? It means that you will NEVER be able to have vertical parallel lines to construct a wall, let alone a building over 2000 feet tall (in Dubai). In the same vain, you can't have perpendicular on that sphere BECAUSE THERE IS NO LEVEL POINT ANYWHERE.
Every blueprint that has ever been created has ONE thing in common, a flat level surface. Now that's not to say there aren't elevation changes, like mountains and valleys. But there has never been an accounting for curvature on said blueprints. And I guarantee if you ask every surveyor what their formula was to account for said curvature, they'll look at you like you have three heads.
Besides, water is the only proof you need. It's called sea LEVEL for a reason. The word horizontal comes from HORIZON, not CURVIZON😳😂 and water cannot flow UP the ball, like the Nile or even the Amazon. It always seeks the lowest point.
flatearthdave.com
NASA
Not A Space Agency or
Never A Straight Answer
WAKE UP PEOPLE!
The moon is mentioned dozens of times in The Bible, so I'm going to say it's real.